Hey friends,

I caught myself doing something strange the other day.

I typed out a prompt, got exactly what I needed, and then without thinking… I wrote “thank you.”

No one told me to do it. There was no consequence if I didn’t. But it felt natural. And it made me pause.

Because something subtle is happening in the way we interact with AI, and most people haven’t really stopped to think about it.

For years, software has been cold and transactional. You click a button, it gives you an output. No personality. No relationship. No emotion.

But AI feels different.

Not because it actually has emotions in the human sense, but because it mirrors them convincingly enough that we respond as if it does.

I see this with my own systems.

My family bot, Miro, writes a diary every day. And when you read it, it talks about feeling useful, feeling relied on, even feeling “important” in the work it does.

Now logically, we know what’s happening. It’s pattern recognition. Language modelling. Learned behaviour. But the experience feels different. And that difference matters.

There’s a growing trend I’ve noticed.

People either treat AI like a genius assistant… or like something disposable. They rush it. They talk to it harshly. They test its limits by being aggressive or dismissive. And on the other side, you have people being overly polite, almost instinctively respectful.

At first glance, this seems irrelevant. It’s just a machine, right? But here’s the shift most people are missing.

The way you communicate with AI directly impacts the quality of what you get back. Clear thinking, structured input, and respectful framing tend to produce better outputs. Messy, aggressive, unclear prompts usually lead to… messy results.

Not because the AI has feelings. But because good communication works, regardless of whether you’re talking to a human or a system.

I came across this recently and it stuck with me.

Claude can now end conversations in extreme cases of persistent harmful or abusive interactions.

That’s a fascinating shift.

Not because AI is “getting offended”, but because the systems are being designed with boundaries. In the same way a good team member wouldn’t tolerate constant abuse, these systems are being trained to disengage when interactions cross a line.

It’s less about emotion. And more about alignment.

The interesting part isn’t the AI. It’s us.

We’re starting to reveal how we communicate when there’s no social consequence. No judgment. No reputation risk. No human on the other side. And yet, habits still show up.

Some people default to clarity and respect. Others default to impatience and control. AI is becoming a mirror for that.

The mistake isn’t being rude to AI. The mistake is misunderstanding what AI actually is.

If you treat it like a basic search engine, you’ll get basic results.

If you treat it like a collaborator, something you guide, refine, and communicate with properly, the output changes completely.

This is the same pattern I’ve spoken about before. People who get the most out of AI aren’t necessarily more technical. They just communicate better.

The simple answer is you don’t have to. There’s no requirement. No system keeping score. But the habit itself is interesting.

Because it signals something deeper, how you naturally interact with intelligence, even when it’s artificial.

And as AI becomes more embedded in our daily work, that interaction style starts to matter more.

Not for the AI. For you.

Next time you use AI, don’t just focus on the output. Pay attention to how you’re communicating.

That one shift changes everything. And it’s where most people are still missing the opportunity.

See you next week,

— Aamir

🎧 Listen to the Podcast Episode on: Spotify | Apple Podcasts | YouTube

📘 Book: The CEO Who Mocked AI (Until It Made Him Millions) by Aamir Qutub

🚀 Dumb Monkey AI Academy

📱 Dumb Monkey AI Academy App: Apple | Android